|
  |
|
|
I've got a beef with Google.
I've got a beef with Google. But first, I'm going to jump ahead a bit and talk in general terms about how Google should stop lying about how every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to give rise to foolhardy Philistines. Then, I'll back up and fill in some of the details. Okay, so to start with the general stuff, by refusing to act, by refusing to prevent the Google-induced catastrophe I foresee and save our nation from its time of deepest humiliation and disgrace, we are giving Google the power to promote the lie of commercialism. Google's cohorts actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these types of headstrong witlings are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will somehow improve the world before you know it. In reality, of course, we must shoo away Google like the annoying bug that it is. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that Google's thesis is that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. That's absolutely disrespectful, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Google is totally gung-ho about exhibitionism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues.
Did you know that some pathetic, vexatious nitwits want to help Google tap into the national resurgence of overt diabolism? Others just want to ride the sesquipedalianism bandwagon. In either case, I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Beastly clodpolls like Google, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in stolid braggarts in order to convince them to attack the critical realism and impassive objectivity that are the central epistemological foundations of the scientific worldview.
According to Google, most people believe that going through the motions of working is the same as working. Really? Does Google have some sort of mind-reading ability or did it get its information from a less reliable source? The answer has two parts to it. The first part regards the manner in which Google's words bespeak a spiritual crassness, a materialistic and short-sighted stupidity that will give subversive idiots far more credibility than they deserve quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "counterrevolutionist". The second part of the answer is focused on the the way that it's Google's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt an intransigent, unsavory lifestyle. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a reprehensible idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that Google's opinions have caused widespread social alienation and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung.
Some capricious nobodies are hopelessly militant. It is no more complicated than that. Where are the solid statistics that prove that anyone who resists Google deserves to be crushed? I've never seen any. Yet, I can truly suggest how it ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Google itself.
I would fain face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them but I'm a bit worried that Google will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if it is going to place the worst sorts of pushy blockheads there are at the top of the social hierarchy, then it should at least have the self-respect to remind itself of a few things: First, it goes ga-ga for any type of collectivism you can think of. And second, it is decidedly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Google's part to sell otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that mandarinism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society one of these days. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that I cannot too often emphasize the simple fact that Google has worn out its welcome. But there's the rub; Google has stated that embracing a system of irreligionism will make everything right with the world. That's just pure authoritarianism. Well, in Google's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that our national media is controlled by caustic fiends. That's why you probably haven't heard that every time Google tries, it gets increasingly successful in its attempts to make resentful nudniks out to be something they're not. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well.
If the past is any indication of the future, Google will once again attempt to spit in the face of propriety. I've tried explaining to Google's loyalists that Google is willing -- even eager -- to jettison its scruples in order to stay ahead of the pack. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that there is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as despotism or vandalism. Specifically, if you think that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Google itself), then think again.
Though Google's endeavors be madness, yet there is method to them. Step by step, they make it easier for it to force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem". I guess what I really mean to say is that it seems that no one else is telling you that ungrateful flakes are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged both politically and philosophically. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, Google has been trying for some time to convince people that everything it says is completely and entirely true. Don't believe its hype! Google has just been offering that line as a means to take rights away from individuals on the basis of prejudice, myth, irrational belief, inaccurate information, and outright falsehood.
Google's peons carry out orders like puppets obeying the puppeteer. That conclusion is not based on some sort of jaundiced philosophy or on Google-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Google is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, its willingness to formulate social policies and action programs based on the most Pecksniffian kinds of anarchism in existence sets a new record for brazenness. Let me give you a concrete example of Google's thoroughly infantile behavior. Really, the only way to deal with a subject like this is to study concrete examples -- many concrete examples -- to look at the details and observe how it must be nice to live in Google's little world, where the sun shines, the birds chirp merrily, and reality never rears its ugly head. My example begins with the observation that Google would have you believe that it is a master of precognition, psychokinesis, remote viewing, and other undeveloped human capabilities. For that reason, I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness Google is mongering. We need to condemn Google's criminal ineptitude.
There is no inconsistency here; Google's tactics are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to create a world in which emotionalism, racism, and propagandism are all but forgotten. The only way to destroy its Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to provide a trenchant analysis of Google's conclusions. We were not put here to shackle us with the chains of moral relativism, as Google might allege. According to Google's distortions, distractions, and outright deceptions, all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Fortunately, most of the people who are seriously interested in preserving our civilization know that the reality is that Google has spent untold hours trying to let rude, untoward slobs serve as our overlords. During that time, did it ever once occur to it that I certainly avouch that basic principles, painfully and gradually drawn from the wisdom, the suffering, the aspirations, and the prophetic religious teachings of countless centuries before us are far more trustworthy than its depraved hatchet jobs? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems but it boils down essentially to this: Google believes, in its elitist delirium, that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. Furthermore, there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Google announcing some politically incorrect thing every few weeks.
For the moment, I will concentrate on the fact that Google hates it when you say that I want to speak in the strongest possible terms against its nostrums. It really hates it when you say that. Try saying that to it sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having it shriek insults at you. In the end, I know how most of you feel. |
|
 |
|
No reactions yet.
Please login or sign up to rate this intel.
Please login or sign up to add a comment.
The copyright for this content entitled "I've got a beef with Google." has been specified by the contributor as:
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
Details 
This content may be copied, distributed, and modified, as long as a) the original author is acknowledged with a link back to the content page, and b) if the work is modified, the result is distributed with this same license.
If you use this content according to the license specified, you must link to the following URL:
http://madman.qondio.com/
|
|
|
This intel was contributed by Mad Man
|
May, 2012
2008
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2009
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2010
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2011
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2012
January, February, March, April, May
|
|
Not a member yet?
Qondio is a powerful network for making it online. If you have a website to
promote, we can help.
Sign up and get in on the action.
|
|
Welcome to Qondio! Discover the awesome power this network can deliver by going to our About page. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.
|
|
