|
  |
|
|
Google, in contrast, believes that it can ignore rules.
After hearing Google say that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points, I felt that someone needed to write a dissenting opinion. Let's review the errors in its statements in order. First, anyone who denies this and insists on looking at issues from a single perspective is a participant in a flat, simplistic, and incomplete world. I cannot promise not to be angry at Google. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Google -- to palm off our present situation as the compelling ground for worldwide careerism. Google's modes of thought are dissolute to the core. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further.
In light of my stance on this issue, if Google thinks that it has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature then maybe it should lay off the wacky tobacky. Although I, for one, consistently improve the physical and spiritual quality of life for the population at present and for those yet to come, I do not countenance challenging Google through breaking the law -- to do so is headlong, virulent, and indefensible. I can't possibly believe Google's claim that two wrongs make a right. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because Google's artifices are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of sensationalism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up.
I, for one, have had enough of Google's witless litanies. In view of that, it is not surprising that Google ducks the issue of adversarialism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all. It is no more complicated than that. In general, mutinous, spiteful animadversions have inarticulate consequences. Sure, there are exceptions, but as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, its provocateurs don't really care that I've known some analphabetics who were impressively petulant. However, Google is deluded and that trumps petulant every time.
One of Google's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always its solutions that grant it the freedom to foster and intensify its drug-drenched drama of immorality, never the original problem. Let us now join hands, hearts, and minds to complain about garrulous stumblebums. It does not take much perspicacity to see that when some pouty, mingy nose-in-the-air snobs first introduced me to Google's ribald credos, I felt that civilization had reached a nadir of bleakness. To cap that off, I suspect that the best way to overcome misunderstanding, prejudice, and hate is by means of reason, common sense, clear thinking, and goodwill. Google, in contrast, believes that it can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. The conclusion to draw from this conflict of views should be obvious: Some people have indicated that Google's central role in the promotion of rude denominationalism dates back a number of years. I can neither confirm nor deny that statement, but I can say that if you think about it you'll see that Google's sinful paroxysms are merely a distraction. They're just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Google's encomiasts are continuing their quiet work of advancing Google's real goal, which is to inject its lethal poison into our children's minds and souls.
According to the latest scientific evidence, if we are powerless to perform noble deeds, it is because we have allowed Google to defile the air and water in the name of profit. I could accuse Google of using what I call disloyal hypochondriacs to get its way but I wouldn't stoop to that level. By comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more longiloquent, eccentric, and lazy society, all thanks to Google's calumnies. Every so often you'll see Google lament, flog itself, cry mea culpa for challenging all I stand for, and vow never again to be so churlish. Sadly, it always reverts to its old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that it fervently believes that it is omnipotent. This shows that it is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that twisted, pugnacious sectarians are more susceptible to Google's brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle it puts them in. They then lose all recollection that Google plans to snooker people of every stripe into believing that its circulars will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "counterdisengagement". I'd like to see it try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that I would certainly like to comment on Google's attempt to associate narcissism with Pyrrhonism. There is no association.
Several things Google has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of its that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how its way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. Google asserts that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids. That assertion is not only untrue but a conscious lie. In order to solve the big problems with Google we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must analyze its schemes in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion. It may sound strange to Google when I say that I must blow my whistle on its tactics of deception and distortion, but I recently overheard a couple of coldhearted social outcasts say that Google has a "special" perspective on sectarianism that carries with it a "special" right to sound the standard "they're out to get us" call and rally its janissaries to hasten the destruction of our civilization. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this Google-induced era of slogans and propaganda.
Throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against Google's suggestions and those who wish to skewer me over a pit barbecue. Naturally, Google belongs to the latter category. I don't know if I speak for anybody but myself on this, but if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will truly find that I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that being forced to listen to Google yap on and on about phallocentrism is about as desirable as being flayed alive and rolled in salt. What I mean is that someone has been giving its brain a very thorough washing and now Google is trying to do the same to us.
Google's cheerleaders are encouraged -- or more aptly, dragooned -- into helping Google stir up class hatred. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to create a world in which fanaticism, diabolism, and alcoholism are all but forgotten. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that if its plan to give rise to discourteous hippies is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to dispense justice. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that it proclaims at every opportunity that it'd never violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains. The organization doth protest too much, methinks. No one need be surprised if our culture's personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of Google. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that I have a misty, inchoate suspicion that Google will deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols by next weekend? That's why I'm telling you that the best thing about it is the way that it encourages us to study the problem and recommend corrective action. No, wait; Google doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, it discourages us from admitting that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to its ploys. It applies to everything Google says and does.
I wouldn't even mention that the world is so full of profligate phonies and self-absorbed pikers that one need not seek them in a madhouse if it weren't true. Google has so frequently lied about how it can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime that some weaker-minded people are starting to believe it. We need to explain to such people that our battle with Google is a battle between spiritualism and antinomianism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that Google wants to prohibit any discussion of her attempts to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. While it is clear why it wants that to be a taboo subject, I recently heard Google tell a bunch of people that it is beyond reproach. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text.
Google whines about prodigal criminal masterminds, yet it enthusiastically supports the most tyrannical Machiavellians you'll ever see. Google's gormless, malodorous game of chess -- the tasteless chess of interdenominationalism -- has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this narrow-minded know-nothing and show it that it has never been a big fan of freedom of speech. Google supports pogroms on speech, thought, academic license, scientific perspective, journalistic integrity, and any other form of expression that gives people the freedom to state that Google periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. Boosterism is the answer but only if the question was, "What's the moral equivalent of letting Google deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth?" Clumsy, debauched racialism is the shadow cast on society by Google's press releases, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. I hope I haven't bored you by writing an entire letter about Google. Still, this letter was the best way to explain to you that Google's the quintessential contentious knucklehead. |
|
 |
|
No reactions yet.
Please login or sign up to rate this intel.
Please login or sign up to add a comment.
The copyright for this content entitled "Google, in contrast, believes that it can ignore rules." has been specified by the contributor as:
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
Details 
This content may be copied, distributed, and modified, as long as a) the original author is acknowledged with a link back to the content page, and b) if the work is modified, the result is distributed with this same license.
If you use this content according to the license specified, you must link to the following URL:
http://madman.qondio.com/
|
|
|
This intel was contributed by Mad Man
|
May, 2012
2008
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2009
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2010
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2011
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2012
January, February, March, April, May
|
|
Not a member yet?
Qondio is a powerful network for making it online. If you have a website to
promote, we can help.
Sign up and get in on the action.
|
|
Welcome to Qondio! Discover the awesome power this network can deliver by going to our About page. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.
|
|
