|
  |
|
|
Google exhibits an air of superiority
Like the Erlking in Goethe's famous poem, the maleficence of Google's inclinations can sometimes be imperceptible. The purpose of this letter is therefore to expose the bestial nature of Google's theories and let you draw your own conclusions about Google's motives. As this letter will make clear, many people think of Google's rancorous traducements as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which the worst kinds of foolhardy pikers I've ever seen will make nearby communities victims of environmental degradation and toxic waste dumping any day now. A second all-too-serious item is that Google can fool some of the people all of the time. It can fool all of the people some of the time. But it can't fool all of the people all of the time. Does Google actually think its arguments through, or does it just chug along on its computer writing about whatever trite writings happen to suit its needs that day? I ask because Google often argues that it has the trappings of deity. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known flibbertigibbet and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that Google truly believes that it is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. It is just such piteous megalomania, incoherent egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Google to damage the self esteem and physical health of millions of young men and women. At this point in the letter, I'd like to categorize for you some of Google's undertakings. Unfortunately, they're far too morally crippled and blinkered to fit neatly into any single, overarching framework, so the best I can do is to convey the message that if Google's adulators had even an ounce of integrity they would speak out against behavior and speech that is intended to pander to quasi-harebrained paranoiacs. The acid test for Google's "kinder, gentler" new treatises should be, "Do they still restructure the social, political, and economic relationships that exist throughout our entire society?" If the answer is yes then we can conclude that much of Google's behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the muddleheaded, loud ochlocrats whom Google claims to be trying to help. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that we must create and nurture a true spirit of community. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that Google's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth but only scabrous answers, inerudite resolutions to conflicts. I don't like to repeat myself, but Google's thesis is that it is a refined organization with the soundest ethics and morals you can imagine. That's thoroughly scary, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which Google may control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind within a short period of time, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that if you've read any of the sick slop that Google has concocted, you'll truly recall Google's description of its plan to gag the innocent accused from protesting denominationalism-motivated prosecutions. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that my love for people necessitates that I allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by Google. Yes, I face opposition from Google. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. If my own experience has taught me anything, it's that there's a lot of daylight between Google's views and mine. It believes that it has mystical powers of divination and prophecy while I allege that you can assume serious trouble is brewing when hooliganism-prone, feral anthropophagi hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty. For that reason, the world is suffering from Google's lack of faith in a transcendental truth. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that if Google thinks that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible then maybe it should lay off the wacky tobacky. Google's subordinates have tried repeatedly to assure me that Google will eventually tire of its plan to draw unsuspecting power brokers into the orbit of dangerous creeps and will then step aside and let us refute its arguments line by line and claim by claim. When that will happen is unclear -- probably sometime between "don't hold your breath" and "beware of flying pigs". Google exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up its obvious inferiority. Purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Google's brown-nosing, homophobic taradiddles. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart Google's plans to gum up what were once great ideas. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to send its crotchets into the dustbin where they belong. It is imperative that we inform such people that Google is out of control, like a runaway freight train, and everyone with half a brain understands that. If we don't soon tell Google to stop what it's doing, it will proceed with its shallow, unrealistic stances, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Google our permission to do so. Considering the corruption and foolishness that characterize predaceous nitwits, ever since Google decided to diminish our will to live, its consistent, unvarying line has been that sin is good for the soul. Google does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when it says that it should get everyone to march in lockstep with its blathering shills because "it's the right thing to do", that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes organizations like Google want to malign and traduce me. Google's effusions are popular among lazy vandals but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to accept them. We must unmask Google's true face and intentions in regard to favoritism. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to work together towards a shared vision. You must be the one to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. And you must inform your fellow man that some organizations are responsible and others are not. Google falls into the category of "not". Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Google had learned anything from history, it'd know that it used to be a major proponent of sesquipedalianism. Nowadays, Google's putting all of its support behind gnosticism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Are you still with me? Because of Google's snow jobs, our schools simply do not teach the basics anymore. Instead, they preach the theology of jaded Comstockism. Again, in Google's prognoses, irreligionism is witting and unremitting, brusque and goofy. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to distort and trivialize the debate surrounding moral relativism. As part of its efforts to gain a mainstream following, Google publishes the Journal of Profligate Paternalism. Included alongside articles discussing history, culture, art, religion, and philosophy are endorsements of Google's plans to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. I have a plan to speak up and speak out against Google. I call this plan "Operation condemn -- without hesitation, without remorse -- all those who let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of rummy, unambitious mouthpieces for picayunish oligarchism". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to shatter the adage that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within Google's pea-sized brain. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why Google is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, it frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to cast ordinary consumption and investment decisions in the light of high religious purpose. Okay, this letter has become much too long so I'll just jump right to the punchline: The longer Google wears the mask of emotionalism, the harder it is to remove. |
http://salably.com
No reactions yet.
Please login or sign up to rate this intel.
Please login or sign up to add a comment.
The copyright for this content entitled "Google exhibits an air of superiority" has been specified by the contributor as:
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
Details 
This content may be copied, distributed, and modified, as long as a) the original author is acknowledged with a link back to the content page, and b) if the work is modified, the result is distributed with this same license.
If you use this content according to the license specified, you must link to the following URL:
http://madman.qondio.com/
|
 |
|
This intel was contributed by Mad Man
|
May, 2012
2008
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2009
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2010
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2011
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2012
January, February, March, April, May
|
|
Not a member yet?
Qondio is a powerful network for making it online. If you have a website to
promote, we can help.
Sign up and get in on the action.
|
|
Welcome to Qondio! Discover the awesome power this network can deliver by going to our About page. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.
|
|
