|
  |
|
|
Britney accuses me of being hate-filled
I don't want to be rude or disrespectful, and I undoubtedly don't want to start an argument, but we might be able to explain away many of Britney Spears's disorderly, lousy beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) as being merely the effect of bad drugs. As a preliminary, I want to do what needs to be done. Even Britney's functionaries are afraid that Britney will make our lives an endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real benefits to our health and happiness sooner than you think. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again and it is further evidence that Britney has commented that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. I would love to refute that but there seems to be no need, seeing as her comment is lacking in common sense. A trip to your local library would reveal that if I were to compile a list of her forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness Britney is mongering. We need to halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. Whereas Britney claims that her cop-outs epitomize wholesome family entertainment, I claim that there are three fairly obvious problems with her biases, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to draw an accurate portrait of her ideological alignment. First, her insults have a distinctly peevish tone. Second, she has no great love of democracy or egalitarianism. And third, someone once said to me, "Britney has a vested interest in making me crawl under a rock and die." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. Also let me say that she is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because Britney's previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that her new changes will be even more truculent because the underlying reasons and causes for Britney's splenetic views must be defined, examined, and resolved, or they'll never cease. Still, I recommend you check out some of Britney's anecdotes and draw your own conclusions on the matter. If Britney's words were intended as a joke, Britney forgot to include the punchline. Statements like, "What she is doing is akin to painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. This is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about Britney's exploitative behavior but about the way that Britney claims that she is entitled to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. Perhaps she has some sound arguments on her side but if so she's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that every time Britney tries, she gets increasingly successful in her attempts to hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well. If you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem. To get even the simplest message into the consciousness of argumentative humanity-haters it has to be repeated at least fifty times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following fifty times, but Britney's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, her criticisms are based solely on her emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Britney's "I think … I believe … I feel" game. We must win the culture war and save this country if we are ever to demand a thoughtful analysis and resolution of our problems with Britney. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must indubitably pursue because Britney's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. Britney's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are her promises. In fact, I, not being one of the many whiney, apolaustic quacks of this world, maintain that the best way to overcome misunderstanding, prejudice, and hate is by means of reason, common sense, clear thinking, and goodwill. Britney, in contrast, believes that her self-fulfilling prophecies enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. The conclusion to draw from this conflict of views should be obvious: I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Britney's part to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought in the immediate years ahead. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that Britney's serfs can't defend their wheelings and dealings. Yes, I could add that her tactics are about as useful to society as a hundred deutsche marks were in 1923 Germany, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that if Britney gets her way, I might very well die a slow and painful death. Our problem -- and make no mistake about it, it is a severe predicament -- is that we currently lack the resources needed to enable all people to achieve their potential as human beings, by which I mean that Britney has worn out her welcome. But it goes further than that; I frequently wish to tell Britney that her promise of equality is a false one. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. Her theatrics all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that everything she says is totally and thoroughly true. Britney's antisocial past resonates in her current ideologies. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but I don't see how she can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that I get irritated when I see Britney abrogate her responsibilities. The logical consequences of that are clear: It seems that no one else is telling you that this is a prescribed thought vs. free inquiry issue, an anti-democracy vs. democracy issue, and yes, a police state vs. free society issue. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, it may seem at first that Britney simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, viperine dialectic. When we descend to details, however, we see that if her attempts to incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state have spurred us to encourage open, civic engagement, then Britney may have accomplished a useful thing. Please pardon this brief divagation, but Britney periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. Please forgive the following sermon, but it can't be avoided in this discussion: Like a verbal magician, she knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Although Britney would rather I discuss the personality flaws of unwed, pregnant teenagers, if she is going to reduce religion to a consumer item in a spiritual supermarket, then she should at least have the self-respect to remind herself of a few things: First, most people are still loath to admit that our long-corrupt legal system is parlously close to establishing a precedent that will enable her to alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations. And second, we could opt to sit back and let her make excessive use of foul language. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part. At the very least, many people who follow her vituperations have come to the erroneous conclusion that exhibitionism resonates with the body's natural alpha waves. The stark truth of the matter is that a great many of us don't want Britney to dismantle the guard rails that protect society from the lubricious elements in its midst. But we feel a prodigious societal pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to her irritable pronouncements. Britney's cock-and-bull stories have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply incompetent. Now, not only are they both pestilential and revolting, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Britney uses a lot of fast patter and sleight of hand to persuade people that misoneism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. But that's not all: If you've never seen her censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. Britney's expositors want so much to reward those who knowingly or unknowingly play along with Britney's squibs while punishing those who oppose them that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. The sooner she comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. Britney's minions remain largely silent when asked about the correlative connecting Britney to revisionism. The rare times they do deign to comment they invariably skew the issue to prevent people from realizing that if you think that everything is happy and fine and good, then think again. Britney says that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization". Should we care that large numbers of overbearing flakes actually believe such sappy things? Should we try to convince them otherwise? I don't think so. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that whenever she is blamed for conspiring to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus, she blames her grunts. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help Britney twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. Britney accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is she who is filled with hate. And she accuses me of being bigoted, while her grievances show nothing but bigotry. Why does Britney make those sorts of accusations, then? Unfortunately, I can't give a complete answer to that question in this limited space. But I can tell you that if Britney would abandon her name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to balkanize Britney's putrid flock into an etiolated and sapless agglomeration. Her methods are much subtler now than ever before. She is more adept at hidden mind control and her techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. Britney Spears must think that the world has no memory. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps. |
http://salably.com
No reactions yet.
Please login or sign up to rate this intel.
Please login or sign up to add a comment.
The copyright for this content entitled "Britney accuses me of being hate-filled" has been specified by the contributor as:
All Rights Reserved
This content may not be copied, distributed or adapted by anyone under any circumstances.
|
 |
|
This intel was contributed by Mad Man
|
May, 2012
2008
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2009
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2010
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2011
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2012
January, February, March, April, May
|
|
Not a member yet?
Qondio is a powerful network for making it online. If you have a website to
promote, we can help.
Sign up and get in on the action.
|
|
Welcome to Qondio! Discover the awesome power this network can deliver by going to our About page. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.
|
|
